E-mail from Michael Roll to Polly Toynbee (June 9, 2014): Professor Richard Dawkins Completely Vindicated

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Scientists all over the world are now making a careful study of survival after death and linking it to subatomic physics - forces that are normally out of range of our five physical senses."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to an Inquirer (January 31, 2003): Presenting the Secular Scientific Case for Survival

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"The whole point of my fight for a balance on media outlets is to point out that there is no balance at the moment."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Lyn G de Swarte (September 8, 2002): Let's Film the Proof of Survival

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"This is it, the crushing scientific proof of survival after death that we have all been waiting for. The experimental proof that matches up with Ronald Pearson's discoveries in subatomic physics."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor Richard Dawkins (February 16, 2014): Professor Stephen Hawking Went to see the Pope. Why?

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I am sorry to say this, but you have been very badly advised by scientists acting as experts on survival, a field they do not understand."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to The Daily Telegraph (January 28, 2014): Professor Halton Arp (March 21, 1927 - December 28, 2013)

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"These huge explosions, quasars, that can be seen in the picture are the result of a primordial gas exploding and creating a new galaxy.

The gas must be coming from the spiritual part of the universe that Sir William Crookes discovered in 1874 following repeatable experiments under laboratory conditions and the results published in The Quarterly Journal of Science – 140 years ago exactly."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Ron Pearson (December 7, 2013): Trying to Bring the Church With Us

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Sorry Ron, the Church has moved much further away from Jesus in the last few years, not closer."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor John Poynton (December 4, 2013): Why I am Optimistic

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"It is now time to give people a scientific balance on mainstream media and educational outlets: Newton or Einstein?"
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Ron Pearson (November 26, 2013): Scientific Teaching has Lost the Plot

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"All scientists now agree that 99% of the universe is missing. Surely this is the spiritual part of the universe that Sir William Crookes discovered in 1874?"
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Steve Clarke (November 30, 2013): Professor Richard Dawkins puts the Record Straight

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Everybody who has made a careful study of life after death knows very well that (…) our pioneers of radio and television (…) were linking the subject of survival after death with subatomic physics."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Jeff Rense (November 29, 2002): Scientific Proof

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Those within the Spiritualist movement now realise just how important it is to repeat the pioneering experiments with materialisation mediums. This time using modern recording equipment under the direction of contemporary professors of physics from Cambridge University."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor Peter Wadhams (August 4, 2002): Sir William Crookes

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I am familiar with the usual outrageous accusations aimed at Sir William Crookes, that he was a liar, a cheat, a crank, a fraud and that he was having sex with the medium that he worked with. However, in last months issue of The Paranormal Review (July 2002) Professor Bernard Carr reports that the obscurants have also floated the idea that Sir William must have been poisoned by the chemical element that he discovered - thallium!"
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to the Western Daily Press (October 30, 2013): Censored Historical Facts and Scientific Discoveries

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"All the hard work has already been done but suppressed. All we have to do is just point people in the direction of two philosophical giants, Thomas Paine and Arthur Findlay, the most valuable Scotsman ever."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Sam Nicholls (December 10, 2002): James Randi

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"[Randi] and his supporters are always given total freedom on all media and educational outlets in the UK to attack arguably two of the greatest scientists that Great Britain has ever produced: The President of the Royal Society and holder of the Order of Merit, Sir William Crookes, and the inventor of radio, Sir Oliver Lodge FRS. No scientist, however well qualified, is allowed on media and educational outlets to balance these attacks."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Victor Zammit (August 26, 2002): Professional Wreckers

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"The time has come for people to realise that it's a scientific fact that we all survive the death of our physical bodies and it's nothing to do with believing in priestcraft."
Read More...

Letter from Dr Peter Wadhams to Michael Roll (November 11, 2000): Experimental Proof of Survival after Death

In his letter, Dr Wadhams writes:
"There was no question about the seriousness of [Sir William Crookes'] psychic investigations, and his endorsement of Katie King represented a real challenge to science. It was a challenge which science flunked, of course, perhaps because conventional scientists were being asked to swallow too much too quickly."
Read More...

Open Letter from Michael Roll to Professor Brian Josephson (December 11, 2002): Linking Survival with Subatomic Physics

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"There can be no excuse for refusing to look at experiments."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Victor Zammit (August 25, 2002): Professional Wreckers

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"[Dr John] Beloff is the perfect ally for James Randi and all the rest of the professional wreckers who are fighting with all their might to block the secular scientific case for survival from reaching the public."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Charles Lowson (November 17, 2002): Only the Proof of Survival After Death is Censored, Evidence is Allowed Out

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"As biologists flatly refuse to recognise people in the invisible part of the universe, most of their conclusions are just as false as the base that the physicists have started from. Until they all do a complete u-turn orthodox scientific teaching is going in the same direction as the Church - nowhere."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Charles Lowson (September 9, 2002): Near-Death Experiences

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"(...) Arthur Findlay insisted on getting rid of the emotive word "spirit" and making sure we always use the scientific word "etheric". I am bringing all the free thinkers with us solely because I have got rid of all the words associated with the evil forces of priestcraft."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to John Samson (September 16, 2002): Society for Psychical Research

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"This crushing proof of survival after death was not only censored by those who control what sees the light of day within the one-god religion of Spiritualism. It has also been censored by the thought police who have infiltrated the Society for Psychical Research ever since I first submitted these reports in 1983."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor Deborah L Delanoy (December 5, 2002): The Perrott-Warrick Scholarship

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"[Sir William Crookes] proved there are people living in the invisible part of the universe with repeatable experiments under laboratory conditions. As you have received money from the Perrott-Warrick fund to look into the subject it is essential you take part in experiments with a materialisation medium."
Read More...

Letter from Michael Roll to Professor Brian Josephson (December 1, 2002): Scientific Proof and the Media

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"Whenever a scientist makes a public stand and links so-called paranormal phenomena with quantum mechanics, that is, hints that there may be a rational scientific explanation to account for any aspect of the "paranormal", it's as if a button is pushed on media computers and a list of names pop up of "experts" who will immediately be wheeled on to rubbish any scientist who dares to support Sir William Crookes and Sir Oliver Lodge, the pioneers of radio, television and subatomic physics."
Read More...

An Open Letter to the Bath-based Scientist Ronald Pearson (June 27, 2002): Professor David Fontana

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"(...) the former President of the Society for Psychical Research, the psychologist Prof. David Fontana, is lecturing to students linking life after death with subatomic physics (...)"
Read More...

E-mail from Jeff Rense, to Michael Roll and Ron Pearson (April 4, 2002): Presenting the Secular Scientific Case for Survival

In his e-mail, Jeff Rense writes:
"There was without question, an instinctive recognition by millions of listeners that your and Ron's work is LOGICAL, SENSIBLE, and PRAGMATICALLY brilliant."
Read More...

Letter from Michael Roll to The Royal Society (April 26, 2002): Philosophical Balance

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"I see that Professor Bernard Carr, the President of the SPR, has been booked to speak at The Royal Society on 9th May. May those of us who have started from the base that Sir William Crookes and Sir Oliver Lodge were correct in their conclusions be permitted to balance the thoughts of Prof. Carr and the hierarchy of the SPR?"
Read More...

Letter from Michael Roll to Dr Peter Wadhams (14 June, 2001): Destruction of Sir William Crookes FRS

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"We can only stop this appalling deception if all scientists take action to introduce a balance on all media and educational outlets. Supporters of Crookes are censored at the moment."
Read More...

Letter from Michael Roll to Lord May (November 16, 2005): Subatomic Physics: The Study of the Invisible Part of the Universe

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"Surely Ronald Pearson must now be in line for the Nobel Prize for Physics that should have been given to the pioneers of subatomic physics, Sir William Crookes and Sir Oliver Lodge? I can't think of anything more important than the scientific discovery of the so-called next world because it affects every person on Earth. "
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Victor Zammit (July 2, 2001): The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Uncomfortable discoveries in physics that prove we all survive the death of our physical bodies are being deliberately blocked from even coming to the attention of people in Great Britain for them to accept or reject as the case may be. This is solely to keep the old-boy network ticking over nicely."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Gary Schwartz (May 1, 2003): The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death Belongs to Every Person on Earth

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"This begs the question, why has Prof. Archie Roy kept quiet about the revolutionary mediumship of Rita Goold that he witnessed in 1983?"
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor B D Josephson (February 24, 2003): "Psi Supporters"

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I hope you are right and the "psi supporters" at Edinburgh University now pluck up the courage to come out in the open and back Parnia and Fenwick."
Read More...

Open Letter from Michael Roll to Professor John Poynton (November 28, 2005): A Fair Balance in SPR Publications

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Surely in a situation as divided as this, rules should be made that all editors must be duty bound to always balance these two conflicting opinions, especially as I have proved to you that scientists within The Royal Society are relying on their colleagues within the SPR to keep a sharp look out for any important discoveries in what Sir Oliver Lodge called "Psychic Science"?"
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Barry Eaton (April 18, 2003): The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death Belongs to Every Person on Earth

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"In order to protect the jobs and reputations of professional "experts", organisations and Trust funds that have been set up specifically to look into life after death and related subjects have been infiltrated and destroyed from within. Huge amounts of money have been deliberately funnelled towards "experts" who can be relied upon to make sure the public never have access to the published work of scientists who started from the base of linking survival after death with the scientific discipline of subatomic physics - the study of the invisible part of the universe."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Ron Pearson (January 21, 2003): Scientific Proof of Survival

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"In all my writings, broadcasts and lectures I say the religionists are basically correct, we do indeed possess a soul and survive the death of our physical body. The priests and the believers in priestcraft flatly refuse to grab this lifeline."
Read More...

Letter from Tom Jones to Dr Chris Roe (November 22, 2001): Survival Research

This letter was written in response to Prof. David Fontana's article about survival research in the October issue of Paranormal Review.

In his letter, Tom Jones writes:
"I am at a loss to understand why the Paranormal Review is not concentrating more on the study of the invisible part of the universe - quantum mechanics."


Thomas Jones quotes the Nobel Laureate for Medical Science, Professor Charles Richet:
"There is ample proof that experimental materialisations should take definite rank as a scientific fact."
Read More...

Letter to The Royal Society (December 12, 2004): Meddling in Divinity and Metaphysics

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"I feel it's now time to abandon your 17th century pact with the Vatican - "not to meddle in divinity and metaphysics"."
Read More...

E-mail from Professor Peter Wadhams to Michael Roll (May 7, 2004): Sir William Crookes

In his e-mail, Professor Peter Wadhams writes:
"It is a psychological phenomenon. Deep down they know that great scientists who engage in this kind of work and get positive results should be believed and should cause this subject to become a central theme of the world's scientific effort. But they dare not accept this thought. So to square their consciences and make the dissonance less extreme they have to invent reasons to pretend that the great scientist is not actually as great as he seems, that he's somehow naive or bonkers or that his conventional discoveries weren't as important as they at first appear."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Hugh Thomas (February 28, 2004): Balancing the Arguments of So-Called Experts

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Why can't we see our qualified British physicists balancing the arguments of the American magician James Randi and the professional obscurants who are on his side?"
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to New Scientist (March 9, 2005): The Discovery of People in the Invisible Part of the Universe

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I consider the "Cleaver Report" to be one of the most important scientific experiments ever. This is because he carried out the experiment in 1982 that Sir William Crookes was unable to do in 1874."
Read More...

Response from Michael Roll to Colin Fry's Complaint (May 10, 2002): Scientific Proof

In May 2002, the medium Colin Fry complained about a statement made on this site.

In an e-mail, written on July 11, 2001, it was stated that Colin Fry had offered to work with Psychical Research Involving Selected Mediums (PRISM) and that PRISM did not take up his offer.

Colin Fry's e-mail to us is reproduced here, with a statement from Michael Roll.

In e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"This proof that we all survive the death of our physical bodies belongs to every person on Earth, not just a handful of people who happen to wander into the Spiritualist movement which is an officially recognised one-god religion."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor John Poynton (July 16, 2013): The Cosmological Location of the Spiritual Part of the Universe

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"How right you were when you made that statement that the greatest breakthrough will come via physics and not psychology."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Montague Keen (December 2, 2003): Perrott-Warrick

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I can't understand why the latest recipient of money from the Perrott-Warrick fund, Prof. Delanoy, refuses to take part in any experiments with a materialisation medium. This is the only type of medium that can actually prove survival after death with repeatable experiments under laboratory conditions where all five of our senses are working."
Read More...

Open Letter to His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales (June 30, 2002): Ronald Pearson

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"[Sir William Crookes] was quite rightly made President of The Royal Society, knighted and awarded the highest decoration in the land - The Order of Merit.

Surely the same honour should be bestowed on the Derbyshire scientist Ronald D. Pearson who has provided the missing mathematics to back up the experiments that were carried out by Sir William Crookes whose paper was published in 1874 in The Quarterly Journal of Science?"
Read More...

Letter to the Producer of the Richard and Judy Show (June 28, 2002): Scientific Proof

In his letter In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"Scientists all over the world who have been fighting against linking survival after death with the scientific discipline of subatomic physics have now jumped on our winning bandwagon, including the Vatican's scientists led by the Jesuit priests!"
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to David Duffield (January 6, 2003): Philosophical Balance

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I am appealing to the British sense of fair play. Every time you hear James Randi and his devoted followers, who still have total control of all media and educational outlets, attack our great scientist Sir William Crookes. Please say, all right, we have heard your case that Crookes was a liar, a fraud, a crank, a gullible Spiritualist, and a sex maniac. May we now please hear from qualified scientists who disagree with everything you say about this former President of the Royal Society?"
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Stephen Cox, of the Royal Society (May 3, 2005): The Discovery of People in the Invisible Part of the Universe

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Everything now rests with The Royal Society abandoning their 17th century pact with the Vatican never to make a study of forces in the universe that are beyond our five physical senses - so-called spiritual matters. All the religious killing will stop when people find out they are only fighting over supernatural mythology invented by priests who knew nothing about cosmology."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Denise Iredell (January 23, 2005): Survival or Oblivion? Let's Give People a Choice.

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
”You are one of the few people left alive who witnessed Helen Duncan's mediumship that gave such hope and comfort to people who had lost loved ones, especially as she was operating not long after the terrible slaughter of the First World War. Please be kind enough to put in writing to me what you said on the phone yesterday - that the red light that was used at a Helen Duncan experiment was bright enough to see all the people in the room including the expressions on their faces, that two "dead" people you knew very well fully materialised, a close family friend and a girl you were at school with.”
Read More...

Letter from Michael Roll to John Pilger (February 20, 1997): Censored Philosophers

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
”As you know the way to destroy any philosopher or scientist who is a danger to established thinking is to float a lie in the press and media, then censor out those who try to put the record straight.”
Read More...