E-mail from Michael Roll to Polly Toynbee (May 3, 2014): These Religious Nuts are Determined to get us in a Third World War

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Only Nigel Farage has had the guts to warn that it is the EU that is causing all the hatred in the Ukraine."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Wales on Sunday (April 28, 2014): Can we now Hear the Scientific Case for a Separate Mind and Brain?

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"We can only hope that in the future, whenever the subject of life after death is featured on mainstream media and educational outlets, that the readers, listeners and viewers will be presented with a fair balance; that people always have access to the two expert opinions."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to UK Newspapers (December 19, 2013): Scientists Agree that the Spiritual Part of the Universe Exists

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"We should have been following Sir Isaac Newton's spiritual model of the universe, not Einstein's materialistic model."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor Brian Josephson (December 18, 2013): Scientists Agree that the Spiritual Part of the Universe Exists

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Newton was on our side, he recognised that we all possess a soul that separates from the dead physical body."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Ron Pearson (November 26, 2013): Scientific Teaching has Lost the Plot

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"All scientists now agree that 99% of the universe is missing. Surely this is the spiritual part of the universe that Sir William Crookes discovered in 1874?"
Read More...

Open Letter from Michael Roll to Professor Brian Josephson (December 11, 2002): Linking Survival with Subatomic Physics

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"There can be no excuse for refusing to look at experiments."
Read More...

Letter from Michael Roll to Professor Brian Josephson (December 1, 2002): Scientific Proof and the Media

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"Whenever a scientist makes a public stand and links so-called paranormal phenomena with quantum mechanics, that is, hints that there may be a rational scientific explanation to account for any aspect of the "paranormal", it's as if a button is pushed on media computers and a list of names pop up of "experts" who will immediately be wheeled on to rubbish any scientist who dares to support Sir William Crookes and Sir Oliver Lodge, the pioneers of radio, television and subatomic physics."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor Peter Wadhams (December 20, 2001): James "The Amazing" Randi

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"Randi is a fraud, he is taking money under false pretences, setting himself up as an expert on a subject, when in fact he is only a professional wrecker."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Professor B D Josephson (February 24, 2003): "Psi Supporters"

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I hope you are right and the "psi supporters" at Edinburgh University now pluck up the courage to come out in the open and back Parnia and Fenwick."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Fellow Atheists (August 29, 2002): Religion - The Great Hoax on the Human Race

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Please join the survivalists in their fight against the great religious hoax on the human race. This way we can stop the born-again Christians in the White House from plunging us all into the Third World War."
Read More...

Letter from Tom Jones to Dr Chris Roe (November 22, 2001): Survival Research

This letter was written in response to Prof. David Fontana's article about survival research in the October issue of Paranormal Review.

In his letter, Tom Jones writes:
"I am at a loss to understand why the Paranormal Review is not concentrating more on the study of the invisible part of the universe - quantum mechanics."


Thomas Jones quotes the Nobel Laureate for Medical Science, Professor Charles Richet:
"There is ample proof that experimental materialisations should take definite rank as a scientific fact."
Read More...

E-mail from Professor Peter Wadhams to Michael Roll (May 7, 2004): Sir William Crookes

In his e-mail, Professor Peter Wadhams writes:
"It is a psychological phenomenon. Deep down they know that great scientists who engage in this kind of work and get positive results should be believed and should cause this subject to become a central theme of the world's scientific effort. But they dare not accept this thought. So to square their consciences and make the dissonance less extreme they have to invent reasons to pretend that the great scientist is not actually as great as he seems, that he's somehow naive or bonkers or that his conventional discoveries weren't as important as they at first appear."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Hugh Thomas (February 28, 2004): Balancing the Arguments of So-Called Experts

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"Why can't we see our qualified British physicists balancing the arguments of the American magician James Randi and the professional obscurants who are on his side?"
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Susan Woodward of Talksport (March 22, 2002): Academic accuses me of inventing Prof. Peter Wadhams!

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"we have stirred up a hornet's nest of hate from academics who are going to be made to look stupid as the truth hits more and more people.

(...) One academic got in such a state he accused me of inventing Prof. Peter Wadhams and that he has checked with Cambridge University and that there is no Prof. Wadhams there!"
Read More...

Letter from Michael Roll to Victor Zammit (October 3, 2001): Linking Survival with Subatomic Physics

This letter was written about Nobel Physics Laureate, Prof. B. D. Josephson, head of the Cavendish Laboratory at Cambridge University.

In his letter, Michael Roll writes:
"The wrath of public opinion will destroy the religious and scientific establishments throughout the world immediately millions do the same as Josephson - link the "paranormal" with subatomic physics."
Read More...

E-mail from Michael Roll to Montague Keen (December 2, 2003): Perrott-Warrick

In his e-mail, Michael Roll writes:
"I can't understand why the latest recipient of money from the Perrott-Warrick fund, Prof. Delanoy, refuses to take part in any experiments with a materialisation medium. This is the only type of medium that can actually prove survival after death with repeatable experiments under laboratory conditions where all five of our senses are working."
Read More...